20 September 2009: DNA
Though New Delhi's official reaction has been better half a loaf than none, India need not be unduly elated with the cases filed against Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed's under Pakistan's anti-terrorism law in Faisalabad. It is obvious that this is a gesture, a sop even, on the eve of talks between the two sides.
Action against Hafiz Saeed is one way that Pakistan can prove its sincerity to India The bilateral dialogue has to go forward on the basis of broader, substantial issues. There is no doubt that what Pakistan does with the culprits of the Mumbai terror attack will be the litmus test of its sincerity in dealing with anti-India terrorist networks there. But it cannot be the sole criterion of the complex peace process between the two countries. This is indeed the tacit view of the Manmohan Singh government, but it is under intense media pressure to adopt a tougher stance. What is to be avoided is the temptation to play to the gallery and talk tough when it is evident that posturing is of no help.
Pakistan's obligation to deal with Saeed and other terrorists remains. Pakistan leaders cannot hope to establish their anti-terror credentials by loud protestations. Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari has spoken on the issue on predictable lines in London on Friday -- and ironically 33 people were killed in a bomb attack in the northwest of Pakistan the same day -- but it would not mean much if no credible action follows. Action against Saeed is one way that Pakistan can prove its sincerity to India.
There is of course the argument that Pakistan must act against terrorists in its own interest but that is not an argument for the Indian government to make.
As far as New Delhi is concerned, it is action against anti-India terrorists that is required. Islamabad cannot deny that there are many groups based in Pakistan waging jihad against India and it has an obligation under international law to curb their activities.
While Pakistan's actions in the matter are to be closely monitored, India should not be so obsessed that policy decisions hinge on the details. Prime minister Manmohan Singh's approach that India has no option but to continue to engage with Pakistan is not without merit. The bilateral dialogue must continue but it should not be held hostage as to what Pakistan does or does not do in particular cases. India must be firm and clear on this issue and at the same time keep a wary eye on Pakistan's actions.
