Another analyst who follows Iran closely, Mark Fitzpatrick of London's International Institute for Strategic Studies, said Natanz and Lavizan were 'two of many areas in which the IAEA has asked additional questions.'
He called the Iranian moves 'a small show of cooperation, but I don't think it gets Iran off the hook in terms of meeting the Security Council mandate for full cooperation.'
VIENNA (AFP) - Iran has agreed to hand over records of its uranium enrichment work in a boost to UN efforts to determine whether Tehran seeks nuclear weapons, but diplomats and analysts said more cooperation is needed.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei told the IAEA's 35-nation board of governors yesterday that Iran would finally provide the sought-after records.
Tehran had rebuffed previous IAEA demands for months, while pushing ahead with enrichment operations in defiance of a UN Security Council call for it to suspend the sensitive nuclear work.
Iran has also agreed to the IAEA's long-standing request to let its inspectors take more environmental sample swipes on equipment from a former military site at Lavizan, where enrichment work is suspected, ElBaradei said.
'Getting the operating records is a pretty big deal,' said a diplomat with technical training and who is close to the IAEA.
The diplomat said the documents would help the IAEA confirm Iran's insistence that it is only carrying out research-level uranium enrichment at a facility in Natanz in the center of the country.
A second diplomat said the IAEA had reported that Iran was not allowing the agency inspectors access to 'the tail results' -- the depleted uranium produced at the same time as the main product.
'If the IAEA does not receive the tail results it lacks critical data for calculating the uranium and isotope balances,' the diplomat said, referring to the method of verifying the level of enrichment.
Iran says it has not enriched over 5 pct, a level consistent with fuel needs. Uranium for weapons use is usually enriched to more than 90 pct.
David Albright, a former nuclear inspector who now heads the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security think tank, said the new Iranian steps were 'a big deal because the Iranians have been so uncooperative.'
But, said Albright, that concession alone is 'not going to solve the IAEA's problems.'
The new information is 'not going to provide confidence that the Iranians are not going to suddenly accelerate work at Natanz' or that they are 'not building an undeclared centrifuge enrichment plant,' Albright said.
Another analyst who follows Iran closely, Mark Fitzpatrick of London's International Institute for Strategic Studies, said Natanz and Lavizan were 'two of many areas in which the IAEA has asked additional questions.'
He called the Iranian moves 'a small show of cooperation, but I don't think it gets Iran off the hook in terms of meeting the Security Council mandate for full cooperation.'
ElBaradei told his board that limited cooperation by Iran had blocked the IAEA from making 'further progress' on clearing up questions about Tehran's nuclear program, including the scope of its enrichment work.
The IAEA chief said the access to Natanz and the Lavizan equipment were 'steps in the right direction' but that they should be followed in the immediate future by 'additional measures.'
