[
Skip to content
]
skip links
|
Text Only
|
Accessibility
|
Using This Site
|
Site Map
|
widescreen
|
Text Size:
bigger
|
normal
|
smaller
|
Sunday 06 July 2008
Search our Site
SEARCH OUR SITE
home
|
about IISS
|
contact IISS
|
careers
|
arundel strategic consultancy
|
room hire at arundel house
|
MEMBERS' LOG IN
Login
Username:
Password:
Forgotten your password?
Remember Me
Recent Articles
Iran and North Korea: The Proliferation Nexus
Why Japan and the US will welcome Unification
Assessing Iran’s Nuclear Programme
Lessons Learned from Iran’s Pursuit
Can Iran’s Nuclear Capability be Kept Latent?
IISS-UK
London
22:45
IISS-US
Washington
17:45
IISS-Asia
Singapore
06:45
YOU ARE HERE:
Home
staff/expertise
List experts by name
Mark Fitzpatrick
Recent Articles
Can Iran’s Nuclear Capability be Kept Latent?
.
Spring 2007 - - Survival - Can Iran’s Nuclear Capability be Kept Latent?
By Mark Fitzpatrick, Senior Fellow for Non-proliferation
Survival
Vol 49 no 1, Spring 2007
Can Iran’s Nuclear Capability be Kept Latent?
Iran may not yet have made a decision to produce nuclear weapons and the evidence trail of weapons plans and military involvement stops in 2003. If, as seems likely, UN sanctions and financial pressure do not persuade Tehran to stop its uranium enrichment programme, the United States may turn to military options to try to push back the date by which Iran could have a nuclear weapon. Low confidence that air strikes could delay Iran’s weapons programme, however, and the negative consequences that military action would entail should lead policymakers to consider whether the nuclear timeline might be prolonged through negotiation. Accepting the reality of small-scale, intermittent enrichment activity in exchange for tight international inspection access holds some appeal, and the asking price will only rise over time. But legitimising Iran’s programme has significant disadvantages, especially without an assurance of swift and severe penalties in the event the deal is broken.
Buy this article online