BBC News
Unsurprisingly, the UK's papers are divided over the findings of Monday's report by defence experts on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
While the Daily Express warns of "Anthrax Threat on our Streets", the Daily Mirror declares that the document "proves nothing".
The Daily Star reckons that most of the report is based on guesswork and explodes the myth that Saddam is close to developing a nuclear bomb.
The debate over whether the findings are enough to justify military action rages on in the inside pages, and in the leader columns.
The Daily Mail concludes that Messrs Bush and Blair still have a lot of persuading to do.
The Guardian believes the two men are in trouble over the weapons issue, and it accuses them of falling back on "claims, suspicions and half-baked truths".
However, the Daily Telegraph argues that war is the safer option, because leaving Saddam in control of Iraq and its armoury places Britain in incomparably greater danger than deposing him.
The Times agrees and concludes that although the document contains no "killer fact", it makes clear that the threat posed by Saddam Hussein must be confronted.
The Sun thinks that recognition of the necessity of an Allied strike is growing as more chilling details of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are revealed.
