[Skip to content]

Search our Site
.

Iraq's new administration

End of the beginning?
     
On 20 May 2006, Nuri al-Maliki – Iraq’s new prime minister – presented his new cabinet to the parliament in Baghdad. The legislative assembly, sitting in the fortified Green Zone, passed a vote of confidence in Maliki and his administration. Under the new Iraqi constitution this vote inaugurated what should be a four-year term in office.  Both US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair were quick to celebrate the new government as a milestone on the road to stability in Iraq. They stressed that this political breakthrough could allow them to reduce US and British troop deployments in the country. 
 
The nation-wide ballot on 15 December 2005 that elected the parliament was generally perceived to have been a success.  Voter turnout was 76%, with two political coalitions able to mobilise the majority of the Sunni population that had previously boycotted Iraq’s first post-regime change elections in January 2005. However, it took five months of talks for Iraq’s newly-elected governing elite to reach an agreement on the cabinet.  It is indicative of the depth of the political discord surrounding these negotiations that, even after this length of time, Maliki could not find enough agreement to fill the three most important ministerial portfolios: interior, defence and national security.  
 
 
 
Why the delay?
A large part of the delay in announcing the cabinet was caused by disputes surrounding who should become prime minister.  In the wake of the January 2005 elections, Ibrahim al-Jaafari was elected prime minister of the transitional government.  As head of Dawa, one of the two largest parties claiming to represent the Shia community, Jaafari had good cause to assume that he would be reappointed to the post in December.  Dawa and the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) are the two dominant parties in the victorious coalition, the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA).  The UIA won 46.5% of the vote, with 128 of its list elected to the new 275-member parliament.  However, during his year as premier, Jaafari managed to alienate a number of key Iraqi politicians as well as the British and American governments.  He was considered to lack both the personal dynamism and diplomatic skills needed to weld the disparate political factions that dominate Iraqi politics into a coherent coalition government. Both London and Washington began to look favourably on SCIRI’s deputy leader, Adel Abdul al-Mahdi, as a much more suitable candidate for the job.  However, neither Jaafari nor Mahdi could gain a decisive majority within the UIA.  It took the extended application of diplomatic pressure, including a visit to Baghdad by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the then British foreign secretary, Jack Straw, to force a compromise.  On 21 April, the UIA nominated Jaafari’s deputy Maliki as a compromise candidate.  After four months of discord other members of the UIA, the Kurdish parties and the main Sunni political bloc agreed on Maliki as a candidate they could all work with. 
 
Maliki, aged 50, is perceived to be a far more skilled politician than Jaafari. During 2005 he took on the role of the UIA’s chief spokesperson and led the detailed and often bitter negotiations on the constitution. However, like many of the politicians resident in the Green Zone he has also been long absent from the country, having been driven into exile by Saddam Hussein’s regime in 1980, first fleeing to Tehran and then moving to the Syrian capital, Damascus. It is testament to Maliki’s skill that once appointed in late April he took less than a month to cobble together the majority of the cabinet.
 
Constitutionally, the office of prime minister is a weak one. Real political power is vested in the parties, with electoral success rewarded by dividing up the spoils of government, cabinet portfolios and the jobs and resources they bring. Maliki’s task was to build a government of national unity, carefully rewarding the main coalitions while also seeking to balance electoral achievement with the identity politics that the main parties claim to embody. In addition, Maliki had to move ministers who had either proved to be inefficient, scandalous or controversial during the previous year. The result is a cabinet that seeks to balance electoral outcomes with the needs of a population traumatised by the collapse of the state in 2003, the resultant crime wave and now the spectre of civil war.
 
The new administration
The acceptance of sectarian politics is to be seen in the reappointment of Jalal Talabani as president. This not only places a Kurdish politician at the geographical centre of politics in Baghdad, but it also allows Talabani’s long-time rival, Masoud Barzani, to dominate the politics of the Kurdish regional government in the north of the country. Communalist considerations were furthered by appointing a Sunni and a Shia, Tareq al-Hashemi and Adel Abdul al-Mahdi as vice-presidents and a Kurd and a Sunni, Barham Salih and Salam al-Zobaie respectively, as deputy prime ministers.
 
 
However, one of Maliki’s early successes was the appointment of Hussein Shahristani as the new minister of oil. Shahristani is a key member of the UIA but has refused to join any of the parties that make up this coalition. Amongst the new ruling elite his reputation for moral probity is unrivalled. Shahristani trained as a nuclear scientist but fell foul of the old regime for refusing to help further its nuclear ambitions. After imprisonment and torture he escaped into exile amidst the chaos of the 1991 uprisings. By putting Shahristani in charge of the oil ministry, the prime minister has acknowledged the need for a non-partisan figure to oversee the country’s major source of wealth. He has also moved to staunch the wave of complaints about the high levels of corruption and mismanagement within Iraq’s oil sector. The reappointment of Hosheyr Zebari has also been positively received. As foreign minister, Zebari, a Kurd, has sent a powerful message about the politically multi-ethnic nature of the new Iraq. He has also proved to be a redoubtable diplomat, cementing strong ties in Europe and at the United Nations whilst also performing well in negotiations with both Iraq’s Arab and non-Arab neighbours.
 
The limitations placed upon the prime minister’s powers of appointment are highlighted in his choice of other cabinet ministers. Bayan Jabor is a key member of SCIRI and a former commander in its militia, the Badr Brigade. As minister of interior in the last government, he was the focus of sustained criticism for sacking large numbers of staff and replacing them with many of his old comrades from the Badr Brigade. Under his leadership, the ministry’s special commandos were accused of hastening Iraq’s descent into civil war by their use of death squads. Although Maliki has succeeded in moving Jabor from the interior ministry, the politics of coalition government mean that he has simply been shifted sideways to take up the position of minister of finance. The demands of UIA politics also mean that members of Muqtada al-Sadr’s organisation, twice involved in extended and bloody rebellions against coalition forces, are now responsible for shaping the minds of the country’s youth and its health care: Sadr was awarded the ministries of education and health. (Sadr’s organisation is effectively comprised of two groups: the Mahdi Army as the military element; and the Sadrist Current, his political organisation in parliament.)
 
Tasks ahead
Maliki has passed his first test as prime minister by forming a cabinet from Iraq’s divided and antagonistic ruling elite and then securing parliament’s approval. However, that he could not build consensus about who to appoint to Iraq’s most important ministries indicates the size and nature of the problems he has to face in the future.
 
It is from within parliament that the main opposition to Maliki’s government could develop. The presentation of the cabinet to parliament was marked by protest when 15 parliamentarians walked out of the chamber, led by the head of the smaller Sunni coalition, Salih Mutlak of the National Dialogue Front. Mutlak damned the new government for being divisive, sectarian and unfocused. In the aftermath of the elections the unity of the UIA itself was damaged when one of its members, Fadila or the Virtue Party, walked out of the coalition, taking its 16 members of parliament with it. This leaves Maliki’s own alliance with 112 of the 275 seats in parliament. The danger of this parliamentary arithmetic is that Maliki’s government will become severely constrained as it attempts to forge a new voting bloc within parliament for each successive piece of legislation. While the prime minister is devoting his time to this task, the government could revert to business as usual, with each minister carving out a fiefdom within his own ministry, running it for personal or factional benefit and not engaging in the pressing need to build state capacity and extend it across the geographical extent of the country.
 
The most immediate problem that the new government will face is the redrafting of the constitution. The constitution, passed in a national referendum in October 2005, ushers in a highly decentralised federal system. On the eve of the vote, US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad brokered a deal to secure Sunni political participation in the plebiscite. This mandates a committee of the Iraqi parliament to review and possibly redraft its most divisive aspects. However, given the current makeup of parliament, the chances of substantial changes to the constitution look slim. Parliament would have to vote in favour of any revisions before a new draft could be submitted to another national referendum. Although the constitutional committee may well become a focus of intense and acrimonious debate it will probably not deliver political compromise, creating renewed resentment amongst the Sunni population, the majority of whom voted against the constitution in 2005.
 
The selection of Nuri al-Maliki as prime minister and his formation of a new government does represent political progress. However, the danger is that in the aftermath of a successful election in December 2005, politics in the Iraqi parliament and cabinet, locked away as they are within the fortified Green Zone, will quickly become removed from the everyday concerns of the majority of the population. Iraq is a country without a functioning state, struggling to prevent an insurgency degenerating into civil war. If the new government follows the path of its predecessor and becomes mired in the incestuous politics of party competition, then it may well hasten Iraq’s descent into inter-communal strife.
Iraq's new administration
Iraq's new administration - [403 KB] View this document as a PDF file