[Skip to content]

.

Third Plenary Session - M K Narayanan

3rd Plenary Session - M K Narayanan, National Security Advisor, India



The 6th IISS Regional Security Summit

 

The Manama Dialogue

 

Bahrain

Saturday 12 December 2009

 

Third Plenary Session


Nuclear Power, Energy and Security


 M K Narayanan

National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister, India

 


Mr Chairman, distinguished participants of the Manama Dialogue, it is always a great pleasure to participate in the Manama Dialogue.  I think this is the third time that I have been present.  I should have been here last year, but because of the unfortunate incidents I could not attend.  


I believe all of us who are present here recognise the fact that the Manama Dialogue has achieved a well‑deserved reputation as an international conference of high standing and it always, therefore, a pleasure to be a participant.  I commend the IISS and in particular Dr. Chipman, its Director General, for bringing together this extraordinary range of policy makers and experts for this conference.


Mr Chairman, I propose to organise my remarks this afternoon by firstly focussing on current trends in nuclear power globally.  Next will be some thoughts about future trends and challenges as seen from India’s perspective.  Finally I will refer to nuclear security and underline India’s firm commitment to universal nuclear disarmament. 


Mr Chairman, over the past decade, there has been a very major change over the perception of nuclear power the world over.  Today the stage is firmly set for a major expansion in the use of nuclear power.  This renewed, widespread interest in nuclear power, accompanied by the steady growth of the global nuclear industry, has been referred to as a global, nuclear renaissance.  Facts suggest that this phenomenon is now here to stay.

I believe there currently about 436 nuclear power plants in operation in the world.  Over 90% of them are in Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD) countries.  Significantly, however, of the 53 new nuclear power reactors under construction, a very large percentage is in non‑OECD countries, particularly in Asia.  Of particular interest to this audience is the fact that the most important developments in nuclear power are taking place in our region.


In 2006 the GCC announced their interest in a joint nuclear development programme.  Since then the kingdom of Bahrain and the United States have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU).  I think this was last year, 2008.  The United Arab Emirates has concluded a memorandum of understanding with the United States and France with regard to nuclear power reactors.  Egypt has said that its first reactor will come on stream by 2017.  Other countries that have expressed a great deal of interest include Morocco, Yemen, Tunisia, Jordan and Algeria.  There is a similar trend in South East Asia.  Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand have all announced plans for the construction of new nuclear power plants. 


In addition I believe, with Copenhagen in the background, that there is a far greater realisation the world over of the value of nuclear power as a clean and sustainable energy source, essential to avoid the kinds of green house emissions against which we are struggling and to address the challenge of climate change.  A realistic estimate is that the complete nuclear power chain from mining to reactors and waste disposal emits only 3.24 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour.  This compares extremely well with wind and hydropower and is much less than fossil fuels.  In the larger energy source basket, nuclear power is, therefore, an increasingly important component for the nations of the world.  For a number of countries including India nuclear power is seen as the energy coefficient for the future. 


For India energy is vital; this is the engine of India’s economic growth, which has averaged 7‑9% during the last decade.  It is anticipated that by 2030 India’s overall, projected energy deficit, if we rely only on domestic fuel resources, would be 150,000 megawatts.  By 2050 it is expected to go up to the astronomical figure of 412,000 megawatts.  Until such time as solar energy becomes an adequate resource, nuclear power is the only effective way to bridge this gap.  Our internal studies confirm that the various plans we have devised in terms of nuclear energy, if they are expanded and come to fruition, it should be possible for us to produce 60,000 megawatts of nuclear energy in the foreseeable future; that is by 2030.  This is significant, but it is still inadequate to meet our energy deficit. 


Believe me when I say that we are confident that, given India’s mastery of the key aspects of our three‑stage, closed nuclear fuel cycle, we can leapfrog into the future.  Based on ongoing research into advanced fuel cycles, our nuclear scientists have calculated that we could close the energy deficit of more than 400,000 megawatts by 2050.  I know to many of you this may look like wishful thinking, but let me tell that these statistics are based on very realistic projections.  We have already passed many milestones on the way to this target.  We have identified many of them and achieved several benchmarks.  Our 500 megawatt, prototype fast breeder reactor is today in an advanced stage of construction.  We are experimenting with an advanced heavy water reactor, which uses thorium as a fuel and has inbuilt proliferation‑resistant characteristics.  It also has advanced safety and security features.  India’s experiment with fast breeder reactors and the use of the thorium cycle could prove extremely useful to ensure energy security in the future.


International co‑operation is a vital aspect in progressing the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.  The former director general of the International Atomic

Energy Authority (IAEA) has often commended India for its very positive role in the development of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.  I would like to state on behalf of the Indian government that we are ready to place our proven and wide‑ranging capacities and capabilities in civil nuclear reactors at the disposal of those countries, which are currently engaging and emerging in the global renaissance in nuclear energy.  We are ready to help countries with small power grids wishing to enter nuclear power generation at low cost.  Given our experience with thorium‑based nuclear technologies, we are ready to contribute to global research and development into new, proliferation‑resistant fuel cycles.  In many ways we are today at the cutting edge of civil nuclear research.  Along with France and many other countries, we are participants in the thermo‑nuclear experimental research programme. 


I would like to mention to this audience that the peaceful uses of nuclear energy extend far beyond the realms of just power and electricity.  There are many promising applications in the area of medicine, agriculture, food production and food preservation, as well as water desalinisation.  India has supplied Vietnam with nuclear technology to deliver cancer therapy under a programme initiated by the IAEA.  In regard to water management we have a hybrid nuclear desalinisation demonstration project in southern India, which is based on river osmosis and which produces nearly 2 million litres of water per day.  We have another water desalinisation plant, which produces 4.5 million litres of water per day.  This has greatly helped to address water shortages in some of our coastal areas.  Nuclear science is also currently engaged in rejuvenating mountain springs, sources of drinking water in the high Himalayas. 

Last year was a red-letter year from the point of view of India’s progress in the realm of civil nuclear power.  Last year we were able to get an India‑specific safeguards programme from the International Atomic Energy Agency.  From the Nuclear Suppliers Group we also obtained a clean exemption for India.  The Nuclear Suppliers Group decision to resume civil nuclear co‑operation with India recognises India as a country with advanced nuclear technology and an impeccable record of non-proliferation.  The recognition given to India’s use of civil nuclear technology is a highly significant development in the onward march of civil nuclear energy.  Currently we in India are witnessing an explosion in regard to several civil nuclear co‑operation agreements with countries across the globe such as France, Russia, Canada and the United Kingdom. 


Having talked about the benefits nuclear power and energy can achieve for nations, let me come to the issue of nuclear security.  We in India have always been conscious of the possible misuse of sensitive nuclear technologies and proliferation issues.  For this reason India maintains effective export controls on nuclear materials and related technologies.  Even though we are not a party to the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, we have adhered even more strictly than many NPT signatories to non-proliferation norms and requirements.  We fully endorse the International Atomic Energy Agency’s concerns in this regard.  We are fully supportive of its efforts to raise the bar on these issues. 


The task before the international community today is to adopt at one level a more forward‑looking approach to shape the ongoing nuclear renaissance.  At another level there is a requirement to ensure the needs of security are met and to achieve greater safety of nuclear installations and materials.  We need to ponder on this point at some length.  In terms of nuclear safety I think it is important that the very strict norms are constantly upgraded.  These should be strictly followed by any country that wishes to enter the arena of nuclear power.  This is not too difficult.  The norms are easy to follow and I think the IAEA watchdogs are very careful about what is being done there and they take care to see that there are no leakages. 


On the issue of nuclear security, however, I think the issues are much more difficult.  The most serious danger that we see is the possibility of terrorist gaining access to nuclear materials and technologies.  I think the issue is more complex than it is generally perceived to be.  The threat is not only from outside.  In some cases I think the threat is from within and that is something about which we need to be careful. 


In our view the possibility of terrorists gaining access to nuclear materials and technologies and the shadow of nuclear terrorism is perhaps the gravest threat to global security and mankind at this moment.  An act of nuclear terrorism could have catastrophic consequences.  Strict and adequate preventive measures are vital for this purpose.  The world must acknowledge and admit the possibility of a link between international terrorism and the possibility of them being able to obtain nuclear material leading on to weapons of mass destruction.  We need a far more intensive exchange of information and intelligence among nations on the issue of nuclear security.  This has to be under the aegis of IAEA, although perhaps it can sometimes be outside it. 


We need a much better idea about the protective mechanisms in place for new nuclear installations and we must ensure that the norms prescribed by the IAEA are very strictly followed.  Additionally I believe there is a need to put in place a proper international response in case there is a nuclear misadventure.  India has been in the forefront in this respect.  India has introduced a resolution in the UN on measures to prevent terrorists gaining access to weapons of mass destruction.  This was adopted by a consensus by the UN General Assembly some time ago.  This is aimed at strengthening the international resolve to prevent terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction.  It is in this respect that India greatly welcomes President Obama’s initiative to host a summit on nuclear security in April next year.  India will contribute very substantially and actively to ensure the success of this summit.

This brings me to a more fundamental issue – promoting the peaceful uses of atomic energy would be greatly advanced by a renewed commitment to the universal elimination of nuclear weapons.  India has a long‑standing commitment to global, non‑discriminatory and verifiable nuclear disarmament.  India was perhaps the first country in the world to call for a ban on nuclear testing as far back as 1954.  India also called for a non‑discriminatory treaty on non-proliferation in 1965.


In 1988 at the UN General Assembly the then Prime Minister of India, Rajiv Ghandi unfolded an action plan for ushering in a nuclear‑weapon‑free world.  This was a clarion call for universal nuclear disarmament.  In 2006 India again put forward a set of proposals at the UN General Assembly that outlined specific steps that would lead to the elimination of nuclear weapons.  This included a proposal for the negotiation of a nuclear weapons convention that would prohibit the development, production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons and provide for their elimination within a specified timeframe. 

It is unfortunate that, despite the years that have passed, there has not been much progress in regard to nuclear disarmament.  We have recently felt encouraged by some positive signs in this direction.  It would seem that nuclear disarmament is perhaps back on the international agenda.  One of the more important proposals is the one co‑authored by Dr Kissinger, George Schultz, William Perry and Sam Nunn, leading on to the very significant speech made by President Barack Obama in Prague in April this year.  In that speech he outlined his vision of a world free of nuclear weapons.  This has greatly gladdened our hearts.  We also feel encouraged by the willingness of the United States and Russia to negotiate further cuts in their nuclear arsenals. 


Finally, I want to quote from a recent speech made by my Prime Minister at the international conference on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.  This was in September this year.  I believe his words aptly summarise the approach we can follow to ensure success as far as nuclear energy is concerned, as well as its security.  ‘If we can use the power of the atom wisely for the universal good, the possibilities are unbounded.  If we do not, the consequences will also be devastating for peace and for progress that all nations seek for their people.  The choices are stark, and the challenges are, indeed, daunting, but it is not beyond the imagination of the human mind to devise suitable solutions and strategies.  This task will require the collective will, wisdom, and determination of the world community, but it is a task that can no longer be put off.