[Skip to content]

.

07 December 2011- IISS-US Roundtable Discussion - A Transatlantic View of ‘Hot’ Battlefields, Out-of-Theater Targeting, and Cooperation Among Allies

Harold Honju Koh, Legal Adviser, US Department of State and Sir Daniel Bethlehem QC, IISS Consulting Senior Fellow for Law and Strategy

IISS-US Roundtable Discussion


“A Transatlantic View of ‘Hot’ Battlefields,

Out-of-Theater Targeting, and Cooperation Among Allies”


Sir Daniel Bethlehem QC
Consulting Senior Fellow for Law and Strategy, IISS
Former Principal Legal Adviser, UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
 

Harold Hongju Koh
Legal Adviser, US Department of State


Wednesday, December 7, 2011


IISS-US, 2121 K Street NW, Suite 801
Washington, DC 20037
 
  

Sir Daniel Bethlehem addressed the self defense versus armed conflict debate in counter-terrorism military operations; out-of-theater targeting; and the challenges of cooperation among allies. Harold Koh commented on his remarks. 
 

Daniel Bethlehem is Consulting Senior Fellow for Law and Strategy at the International Institute for Strategic Studies and Director of Legal Policy International Ltd (LPI), a policy consultancy working on high legal content foreign policy issues. He was Principal Legal Adviser of the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office from May 2006 to May 2011.


Harold Hongju Koh is Legal Adviser at the US Department of State. He is on leave from Yale Law School, where he served as Dean from 2004 to 2009. He was previously the Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor from 1998 to 2001.

This meeting was moderated by Andrew Parasiliti, Executive Director, IISS-US and Corresponding Director, IISS-Middle East.
 
IISS-US events are for IISS members and direct invitees only. For more information, please contact events-washington@iiss.org or (202) 659-1490.

© US Department of Defense
By Daniel Bethlehem, Consulting Senior Fellow for Law and Strategy

The killing of Anwar al-Awlaki  has given sharper focus to a debate that was already raging about the use of drones, the scope of the September 18, 2001 Congressional Authorization for Use of Military Force, and the wider issues raised by John Brennan’s Harvard speech of September 16, 2011 on security and values. Read more